Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell
Posted by Cathryn on October 15, 2001 at 18:59:30:

Thanks Lowell and Mark for your input.

As one thought leads to the next, I now wonder about the possibility of (don't laugh) pumping lubricant into high-risk faults on a regular basis to allow the plates to slide more easily and release strain with smaller earthquakes over a long period (such as we see in the Hollister section of the SAF) instead of all at once (such as we see in the locked sections).

Am I out to lunch on this one?

Cathryn


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - mark  20:24:01 - 10/15/2001  (10053)  (1)
        ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn  23:24:27 - 10/15/2001  (10060)  (2)
           ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Don In Hollister  00:18:32 - 10/16/2001  (10063)  (1)
              ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn  03:30:36 - 10/16/2001  (10065)  (0)
           ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - mark  23:57:52 - 10/15/2001  (10062)  (1)
              ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn  03:19:15 - 10/16/2001  (10064)  (1)
                 ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Canie  08:21:59 - 10/16/2001  (10067)  (0)
     ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Lowell  19:27:47 - 10/15/2001  (10048)  (1)
        ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn  22:51:28 - 10/15/2001  (10057)  (1)
           ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Lowell  23:10:49 - 10/15/2001  (10059)  (1)
              ● Re: Some thoughts and Q's for Lowell - Cathryn  23:28:47 - 10/15/2001  (10061)  (0)
     ● Oops. Forgot to thank Roger. (NT) - Cathryn  19:03:57 - 10/15/2001  (10044)  (0)