Re: thought for the day-Censorship
Posted by Canie on October 08, 2001 at 16:49:53:

Hi all - Though the discussion was/is a bit heated, I don't think its been too bad, but then of course I'm not the one it was aimed at.

Even when something may get aimed my way I try not to take it personally.

I like to encourage a little scientific debate - One good aspect to DiB is that he does question everything and makes you back yourself up or ask yourself the hard questions - then its up to you to Trust Yourself and continue on your explorations or not. I would expect DiB to respond once the references were given him but maybe he's still researching it.

I missed the gender aimed remarks unless it was DiB being accused of being female - Heck, isn't that a compliment? But Lowell is right - if it gets down to name calling or harassment then we cut off the offending person if they don't straighten up.

Good scientific debate is always welcome - name calling isn't - that's the bottom line.

Canie


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - dib  20:02:41 - 10/10/2001  (9908)  (1)
        ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - Cathryn  21:42:22 - 10/10/2001  (9918)  (1)
           ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - Cathryn  21:54:08 - 10/10/2001  (9919)  (1)
              ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - dib  06:09:59 - 10/11/2001  (9927)  (0)
     ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - Canie  19:56:17 - 10/8/2001  (9852)  (1)
        ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - Cathryn  20:15:29 - 10/8/2001  (9853)  (0)