|
Re: thought for the day-Censorship |
Hi all - Though the discussion was/is a bit heated, I don't think its been too bad, but then of course I'm not the one it was aimed at. Even when something may get aimed my way I try not to take it personally. I like to encourage a little scientific debate - One good aspect to DiB is that he does question everything and makes you back yourself up or ask yourself the hard questions - then its up to you to Trust Yourself and continue on your explorations or not. I would expect DiB to respond once the references were given him but maybe he's still researching it. I missed the gender aimed remarks unless it was DiB being accused of being female - Heck, isn't that a compliment? But Lowell is right - if it gets down to name calling or harassment then we cut off the offending person if they don't straighten up. Good scientific debate is always welcome - name calling isn't - that's the bottom line. Canie Follow Ups: ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - dib 20:02:41 - 10/10/2001 (9908) (1) ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - Cathryn 21:42:22 - 10/10/2001 (9918) (1) ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - Cathryn 21:54:08 - 10/10/2001 (9919) (1) ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - dib 06:09:59 - 10/11/2001 (9927) (0) ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - Canie 19:56:17 - 10/8/2001 (9852) (1) ● Re: thought for the day-Censorship - Cathryn 20:15:29 - 10/8/2001 (9853) (0) |
|