Re: Petra's problem regarding frequency of quakes in San Francisco Bay area
Posted by Petra Challus on September 07, 2001 at 17:45:35:

Hi Lowell,

Thanks for your time in taking a serious look at the 3> quakes for the Bay Area.

Now, today I was treated to three ear tones. The first was the longest of the three with a crystal sound in the right ear, which means its up in the Sierra's. Lee Vining comes to mind and from there north to Markleville. I'm curious to see what gets delivered and in what time frame. This area usually comes on rather rapidly, but I never know. So I'm not making a forecast just a note. I expect a quake of 3.0 - 4.5, with two distinct aftershocks.

I do love curious things, and want to know the why of everything. The other day you brought up the subject of UFO's. I know quite a few people who have either seen them or strongly believe in their existence. My conclusion is that for some unknown reason these people can receive the vibration level that a UFO delivers and that's why they can see them and the rest of us can't. For us, the non-seers we just work at a different vibratory level. Frankly, Lowell, I don't ever want to see one. Though I like adventure, not that kind, thank you.

Of course I have a whole different banana going in that I can see ghosts. You see I'm tuned in to the ethos and thus for me they are there. They look like you and me, to me, but lots of people can't see them. Some people have a problem in believing in them, like UFO's, but it shouldn't be all that difficult to understand that they share the same space we do, except they are about 6 inches higher in dimension, so that's why people say they seemed to glide. Interesting, huh? If anyone's got a haunted house, let me know, I'd like to visit.

Do you think I've been rambling? No, not at all. The point is that everything in the universe operaters at a certain frequency of dimension in time and space. Kirilian photography has shown conclusively that humans are electric as well as plants and many other living things. If one accepts this thoughtthen it makes the "big picture" in my way of thinking far easier to understand. For instance, what do you hear when you are on the telephone with someone? You hear a vibration that comes through the telephone lines.

So it leads us to this question; what is real? If you are dreaming are you really there, or is it imaginary? If you send a man out in space for many years and he returns young, why is that? Why do animals age 7 or so years per one human beings life span? Therefore, if you don't believe its possible to predict earthquakes, then it must not be possible.

I'm glad Don's camping out on this board, he's a true demonstration that eating garlic and onion sandwiches and drinking Corona beer brings on great clarity in predicting earthquakes. I'd like to see a random sampling of predictive seismologists undertake this diet and see if they have the same, better, or poor results. Of course, I don't think I'd want to be around them while they were working.

Petra


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Petra's problem regarding frequency of quakes in San Francisco Bay area - Lowell  14:27:25 - 9/8/2001  (9371)  (1)
        ● Re: Petra's problem regarding frequency of quakes in San Francisco Bay area - Petra Challus  16:41:22 - 9/8/2001  (9372)  (0)