Re: Copying Predictions and Losses too!
Posted by Bob Shannon {earth[010AT29]televar[10DOT290]com} on October 29, 1999 at 19:43:51:

>Bob - Bob.... what am I going to do with you ?

> As concerns Jack Coles - My opinion is he is serving his sentance against crimes >committed - Yes he has been judged - I don't have to like the guy or
>what he did but I think he has something when it comes to earthquake prediction, >therefore I will continue to listen to his predictions as I listen to yours.

Bob:
So if you marry Keith and hypothetically you have a daughter from a previous marriage...and Keith has relations with your daughter.....your gonna say..." No problem. ....at least he can predict quakes?"
So why is Roman Polansky not allowed back in America? That would be a better question.....he had relations with an underage girl at Jack Nicholson's house on Laurel Canyon. Now he lives in Paris because it is "ok" to do that there. Last year he tried after years, to come back to America but LA DA said no way they would still prosecute him.....and he still makes movies....I have to interject here that Romans wife was brutally murdered by Charles Mansons gang and had her stomach slit while she was still pregnant...and did this have anything to do with EQ'S???? And! What about Jack N? He said he didn't know it happened... so he was denied an Acadamy Award for a few years then got one while sitting in the front row with his sunglasses being the A his is...Ha!
My best guess is that your very best friend Keith would be in the dumpster if he had relations with anyone more or less a step-daughter........and if he predicted earthquakes from jail you would care less......
How many people care about this??? Am I dealing with people who condone illegal sexual inter-family relations???????

Sorry Canie...I disagree with you!

Let me give you and example of what I got in the eamil today excusing Coles for his deeds:

>Hey, we all get very upset with someone who has done what Cole has. However,
>we must first clean off our own doorsteps. Having a friend that treats those
>like him, I guess I understand it better than most. It isn't easy though.
>According to him, there are those that can be treated such as fondlers,
>exhibitionists, and such. Then there are those that can't, like Blain,
>Daughmer, etc.
>He won't touch those and he's got 45 years experience and a 94% success
>rate.

Now! Are we accepting child rape as a precursor? What in the Hell is wrong with this kind of thinking!???? Please...Your a good and long-time friend..Let me know!