Actually Roger has quite a bit of experience with Dennis, as do I. Pointing out that predicting aftershocks in the 4-5 range after a 7 is statistically a near certainty, especially if your area is huge (I suggest you re-read Dennis's posting) is stating the reality of the situation. If the quake itself had been predicted, then that would be significant, but it was not.

Roger and I are well aware of Dennis's efforts. We are also aware of the extent of his understanding of basic physical processes as we have had to explain them to him on several occasions. You might want to check out Deja News for Dennis, particularly in the middle of last year.