Re: Playtime
Posted by Don in Hollister on July 08, 2001 at 14:14:12:

Hi Lowell. I was wondering when you were going to get to the change in time. When you first told me about this I thought it a little far fetched, but the more I thought about it the more I thought, Why Not? Just because there is something we can’t see or don’t understand doesn’t mean it can’t or doesn’t exist.

I don’t have an answer as to why the earthquake in Florida before the nuclear explosion. Maybe it was nothing more then just a coincident.

Lets suppose the physical breakdown in sub-space is true and can indeed move backward and forward in time. Why does it affect only some areas and not all? Why was Florida affected as opposed to another place? Maybe that explosion prevented a major quake the day before only to have it occur at a later date.

Now I know why I get a headache when I start thinking. My mind is running in circles. I have the feeling its counter clockwise as there are many times I find myself looking for an answer for which the question hasn’t been asked. Take Care…Don the dizzy one in creepy town


Follow Ups:
     ● 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - mark  14:50:23 - 7/8/2001  (8355)  (1)
        ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  16:53:59 - 7/8/2001  (8358)  (4)
           ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Canie  08:24:27 - 7/9/2001  (8371)  (1)
              ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  12:50:12 - 7/9/2001  (8380)  (0)
           ● Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Roger Hunter  05:21:50 - 7/9/2001  (8369)  (0)
           ● Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - mark  20:03:28 - 7/8/2001  (8362)  (1)
              ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  13:06:39 - 7/9/2001  (8381)  (1)
                 ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Don in Hollister  14:17:50 - 7/9/2001  (8382)  (1)
                    ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Lowell  16:06:01 - 7/9/2001  (8384)  (1)
                       ● Re: Strangeness Re: 300 Times the Speed of Light - Acausal? - Don in Hollister  16:46:32 - 7/9/2001  (8386)  (0)
           ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Petra Challus  18:19:50 - 7/8/2001  (8360)  (2)
              ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  08:29:47 - 7/9/2001  (8372)  (1)
                 ● Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  18:53:07 - 7/9/2001  (8391)  (1)
                    ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  16:10:44 - 7/10/2001  (8436)  (1)
                       ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  16:57:20 - 7/10/2001  (8437)  (1)
                          ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  21:46:06 - 7/10/2001  (8440)  (1)
                             ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - Canie  07:58:53 - 7/11/2001  (8445)  (1)
                                ● Re: Concept of Now - Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  19:07:28 - 7/12/2001  (8476)  (0)
              ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  20:12:18 - 7/8/2001  (8363)  (2)
                 ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Petra Challus  00:57:05 - 7/9/2001  (8368)  (0)
                 ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Don in Hollister  21:00:39 - 7/8/2001  (8364)  (1)
                    ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  23:29:44 - 7/8/2001  (8366)  (1)
                       ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - Don in Hollister  00:01:26 - 7/9/2001  (8367)  (1)
                          ● Re: Stranger than Strange? - mark  18:27:53 - 7/9/2001  (8389)  (0)