Re: Amit's predictions
Posted by Roger Hunter on December 17, 2012 at 08:29:58:

Hi all;

just out of curiosity I checked Amit's predictions for date only hits, where any quake in his window of mag 6+ was a hit.

As I said before, chances of success were 0.698 and he got 147 hits out of 151 predictions but his score was still negative (-2.913).

This is because hitting a high probability event isn't worth much but missing one hurts a lot.

One weakness of this method is that it can't handle unlikely hits properly.
Getting a hit where the probability is zero gets such a high score it can't be overcome. Such a case can happen when the NEIC catalog contains no quakes for a particular area and one does happen there. The Myanmar quake was such a case.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● something wrong here - Island Chris  06:58:06 - 12/19/2012  (80850)  (1)
        ● Re: something wrong here - Roger Hunter  07:46:14 - 12/19/2012  (80852)  (1)
           ● Re: something wrong here - Amit  08:48:01 - 12/19/2012  (80853)  (1)
              ● Re: something wrong here - Roger Hunter  09:21:56 - 12/19/2012  (80854)  (1)
                 ● Re: something wrong here - Roger Hunter  09:29:30 - 12/19/2012  (80855)  (0)