atmos anomalies
Posted by John Vidale on September 18, 2012 at 21:14:21:

The post apparently was taken down before I could check which nonsense it discussed.

We had some discussion of these lines of research at a meeting this afternoon. To summarize - Freund's experiments have now been discovered, through a careful check, to simply be errors in how he ran his equipment. A second run of his basic experiment produced the opposite result of the original runs that form the basis of his modeling, and the cause discovered. Maybe his "P-holes" have turned into "N-holes".

The claims by Heki are contradicted by the check from JPL folks. His claimed anomalies local to M9 events turn out to be global disturbances, and not big anomalies.

What is left on the table that has not been discredited?

Apparently CSEP is now willing to accept the atmospheric earthquake predictions for testing at SCEC, so long as the method of their generation is documented, so if there is any power in their methods, it is time for these folks to step to the plate to collect their accolades.