|
Re: Earthquake Triggering Processes – December 26, 2011 |
EQF; What typically happens when you crunch a large dataset is that you will find very small things which give a statistically significant answer because the total cases is very large. But even if true, it's useless. On your list of triggers, you can cross off atomic explosions and outer planet positions. Way too small and we aren't testing any more. But even when we were testing, no associated seismicity. There was a lot of concern over Amchitka, a very large explosion in a very seismic region. Nothing happened. Roger
Follow Ups: ● Re: Earthquake Triggering Processes – December 26, 2011 - EQF 05:18:23 - 12/27/2011 (79502) (2) ● Re: Earthquake Triggering Processes – December 26, 2011 - Roger Hunter 11:56:02 - 12/27/2011 (79507) (0) ● Re: Earthquake Triggering Processes – December 26, 2011 - EQF 06:15:56 - 12/27/2011 (79504) (1) ● phrasebook for pseudoscience - John Vidale 07:35:50 - 12/27/2011 (79505) (0) |
|