I would agree that it is unnecessary to discuss personal matters. However, if someone is making claims to prediction success, then perhaps it is more than relevant to supply minimal identification. I have no idea who you are, I do not understand how you claim to predict quakes, and I have seen no evidence of any independent confirmation of predictions. One does not have to be a geophysicist to ask that reasonable dates, magnitudes and locations be provided by anyone who claims to be able to predict quakes so that the validity and methodology of this can be evaluated. I can predict that there will be quakes tomorrow (6/22) in California, New Guinea and Japan...however, that information is totally useless for reasons that should be quite clear to everybody on this board.