Re: UPDATE - May 24, 2011
Posted by EQF on May 24, 2011 at 16:00:12:

Someone might state or at least think that since this central Asia area earthquake did not occur during the expected time window I am simply making excuses for that. This is not the case. The earthquakes have their own rules. What I am doing is evaluating the data as they are generated in an effort to both forecast earthquakes and learn what those rules are.

In fact, people should be happy that this earthquake did not occur in the expected time window that ended on May 23, 2011. I certainly am happy about it and feel that it can wait for as long as it likes before it occurs.

For certain reasons I don’t want to say when this happened, but when those unusual EM Signals were last detected, in less than 24 hours, many thousands of people perished in a catastrophic earthquake in a central Asia area.

As the popular saying goes, “No (earthquake) news is Good News!”


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: UPDATE - May 24, 2011 - Roger Hunter  17:23:42 - 5/24/2011  (78880)  (2)
        ● Re: UPDATE - May 24, 2011 - EQF  09:18:38 - 5/25/2011  (78884)  (2)
           ● the flaw in your logic - John Vidale  11:09:18 - 5/25/2011  (78888)  (0)
           ● Re: UPDATE - May 24, 2011 - Roger Hunter  10:28:17 - 5/25/2011  (78885)  (0)
        ● a good method - John Vidale  22:38:35 - 5/24/2011  (78882)  (1)
           ● Re: a good method - Roger Hunter  22:41:03 - 5/24/2011  (78883)  (0)