Re: I'd first go for an early warning system
Posted by heartland chris on March 22, 2011 at 19:53:56:

I'm pretty sure they have one; one of the first posts on the quake far below was that it worked. But, I suppose it is likely only designed for certain areas like Tokyo, and could be made more comprehensive? But, there was a post below by Barbara that the early warning system for California was going to cost $80 million...which seemed high.
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● EQ early warning system - Pacific Northwest - Barbara  21:43:33 - 3/22/2011  (78467)  (1)
        ● costly - John Vidale  10:23:29 - 3/23/2011  (78470)  (0)