Re: prediction claims and comments here please
Posted by EQF on March 11, 2011 at 11:57:30:

I probably know as much about electronics as you do. And I have been discussing these signals with some of the top radio people for different frequencies on the planet for years.

One of the problems with the signals is that although they can be detected around the world, it might be that they are highly directional and are strongest at certain locations at different times. So, the radio people are not seeing anything when I myself am detecting signals. It might depend on where people are located. Other people might be detecting some that I don’t.

Another problem might be that the signals are actually “beat” type signals that result from the combination of two other signals. So, people might be looking for a signal at 7000 cycles per second when the true signals being generated are 30,000 and 37,000 cycles per second.

When signals are detected I usually post a warning note. And people maintain good records of signals at different frequencies. If they were seeing something, someone probably would have said something in the past.

In any case, this is not a productive direction in which to focus efforts at the moment. It is more important to get the computer programming and government contact work done. Then, numerous people looking for the signals at the same time should be able to tell how to better detect them. They are in my opinion invaluable earthquake warning signals.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: prediction claims and comments here please - Skywise  12:33:25 - 3/11/2011  (78271)  (1)
        ● Re: prediction claims and comments here please - Roger Hunter  13:00:03 - 3/11/2011  (78274)  (0)