|
Re: Puerto Rico/ Virgin Islands |
My forecasting method has been pointing quite strongly to the 65 W area for several months now. And I have been discussing this with other forecasting personnel around the world. However, since the same line peaks appeared strongly around 65 W before the devastating earthquakes that occurred in Haiti and Chile in early 2010 I have been assuming that those 65 W line peaks were more likely indicating that there could be some activity around 72 W. And earlier this month I was quite concerned about a possible major aftershock for that January, 2010 Haiti earthquake. I am still evaluating those data and will post another note some time if any significant conclusions are arrived at. At the moment I am not really watching for any significant seismic activity anywhere. Even if there is some activity headed for the 72 W area it might not occur for months or longer. My 2010 and 2009 Year Charts showed that those line peaks around 65 W actually appeared around January of 2009 and then disappeared around June of 2009. It is my best present interpretation of those data that the Haiti and/or Chile earthquakes (most likely Chile) were causing EM Signals to be generated for quite a while. Then the fault zone or fault zones temporarily stabilized. Then the signals started to appear again in December of 2009 and especially in January of 2010. Finally, the earthquakes themselves occurred and the signals once again stopped being generated. They started up again a few months ago. Follow Ups: ● Re: Puerto Rico/ Virgin Islands - Roger Hunter 22:15:19 - 1/22/2011 (77972) (1) ● Re: Puerto Rico/ Virgin Islands - EQF 22:54:50 - 1/22/2011 (77973) (2) ● science fiction - John Vidale 10:00:49 - 1/26/2011 (77978) (0) ● Re: Puerto Rico/ Virgin Islands - Roger Hunter 23:36:11 - 1/22/2011 (77974) (1) ● Regarding Earthquake Precursors January 28, 2011 - EQF 02:09:19 - 1/28/2011 (77981) (0) |
|