Hi Petra:

That's interesting. BTW does Don wear a "linen cloth garment" ? (I know you have said that you call him alot and tell him about the tones:)

Teh part I mentioned about corroborating was along the lines of diffusing accusations be skeptics who may argue that perhaps two people conspired to create an illusion of sorts...not my charge...but trying to anticipate what some might say to try and negate the idea(s).

There's still a problem in my mind regarding the idea that the fault issues a tone.... Several observations due not jive with that too well...though it seems the most logical at first consideration it seems.

Too bad your group of "Ear Toners" broke up but it looks like maybe they just started their own web-sites...so this team action is still possible.

Regarding timing...the evidence is accumulating anecdotally (spelling?) that a long interval (up to three weeks seems "about right" in many cases).

A study of logged tones by location could reveal such a time correlation. There are some implications for understanding what is actually happening. Perhaps the data offered recently will shed some light on the matter....

Well...it's OK that not everybody shares this tone thing...since it could easily drive one nuts it seems (with tones going off willy-nilly 'n all)

Thx for the info.

I believe this area of study is important with regards to sensing the range and strength of the signals involved in the quake(s). Of course their are 3 other areas as well....

mark