Re: BOLLOCKS!!!
Posted by John Vidale on November 16, 2010 at 20:22:25:

Interesting - I didn't realize the posts of EQF were so divorced from his measurements.

"Most of the EM Signal data that I base my forecasting program on are data that I collect myself. ... This EM Signal matter is an unproductive area of this research to discuss. At this time, people should really be discussing the data appearing on my Year Charts. ... If people are serious about trying to detect some of the important types of EM Signals I am working with then I can provide some times when they are being detected. And they themselves can try to find some Elfrad or QuakeFinder data etc. that match those times."

I don't think the choice of Skywise's words is as critical as realizing EQF (1) collects his own data, meaning either he runs a global network (unlikely) or he is predicting global earthquakes based on measurements in just his own neighborhood (downright silly) and (2) considers revealing his data not essential in communicating his methods and their purported success (as Skywise says, not science.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: BOLLOCKS!!! - EQF  08:56:47 - 11/17/2010  (77789)  (1)
        ● Re: BOLLOCKS!!! - Roger Hunter  09:52:18 - 11/17/2010  (77791)  (1)
           ● Re: BOLLOCKS!!! - EQF  10:18:58 - 11/17/2010  (77792)  (1)
              ● as usual - John Vidale  20:39:52 - 11/22/2010  (77817)  (0)