|
|
|
Re: EQF & Amit
|
Posted by Roger Hunter on June 17, 2010 at 06:23:23:
EQF; Sure. Nearly every predictor publishes reams of text expounding their theories and making wonderful claims about them. But as I've said, the proof of the theory is in the success of the predictions. And for that, we need a cumulative record of all of them, not just the ones that appear to succeed. For that matter, you don't even make predictions since you don't specify when or where to any useful degree. Roger
|
|
|