|
Re: Question for Amit |
EQF; Ah, something we agree on! Now if I could just convince you that the same argument applies to your graphs we'd be getting somewhere. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Question for Amit - EQF 17:45:32 - 6/7/2010 (77171) (1) ● Re: Question for Amit - Amit Dave 06:40:59 - 6/8/2010 (77174) (2) ● Re: Question for Amit - EQF 04:36:37 - 6/9/2010 (77178) (0) ● Re: Question for Amit - Skywise 22:15:39 - 6/8/2010 (77175) (1) ● Re: Question for Amit - Amit Dave 00:48:17 - 6/9/2010 (77177) (1) ● Re: Question for Amit - Skywise 11:10:19 - 6/9/2010 (77179) (0) |
|