|
Re: Bering Sea Earthquakes May 17, 2010 |
Brian, My detection method is not being discussed too much in public at the moment. One of the reasons that is not actually that important is the fact that I could publish a formal paper on the subject matter. And there are copyrights and patent considerations among other things. When you discuss information like that in a public forum you can lose certain patent rights etc. However, if you look at that detector I mentioned in the last note you can see one detection system that reportedly picks up some of the same signals. And as I said, Ear Tones represent one group of those signals. You can ask anyone for Ear Tone data. But, good luck trying to determine how the Ear Tone signals are being generated! Researchers have tried that over the years with various amounts of success. I have some of my own theories about the Ear Tones. This Wav file indicates what some of the high frequency Ear Tones sound like. The file might need Windows Media Player to be heard. Other Ear Tones can be very low frequency sounds down around 10 cycles per second.
Follow Ups: ● Re: Bering Sea Earthquakes May 17, 2010 - Skywise 23:14:32 - 5/20/2010 (77089) (1) ● Re: Bering Sea Earthquakes May 17, 2010 - EQF 11:49:48 - 5/21/2010 (77102) (2) ● Re: Bering Sea Earthquakes May 17, 2010 - Skywise 12:47:31 - 5/21/2010 (77107) (1) ● Re: Bering Sea Earthquakes May 17, 2010 - EQF 14:29:37 - 5/21/2010 (77108) (1) ● Re: Bering Sea Earthquakes May 17, 2010 - Skywise 15:55:00 - 5/21/2010 (77111) (0) ● Re: Bering Sea Earthquakes May 17, 2010 - Roger Hunter 11:57:02 - 5/21/2010 (77103) (1) ● Re: Bering Sea Earthquakes May 17, 2010 - EQF 12:15:56 - 5/21/2010 (77105) (0) |
|