M6 quakes; test results
Posted by heartland chris on April 21, 2010 at 06:35:53:

OK Amit, give me a break, you apparently need to learn a little bit about statistics. For your 31%, you did not include the numbers where there were 8 out of 9 or 9 out of 9. And, given the numbers for 8 out of 9 and 9 out of 9, you also have to add the numbers for 6 out of 9 and 5 out of 9.

Also, since you have not been posting here for a long time, you may not be aware of Brian's predictions, where on his site he made real predictions based on random choices; I think he called it a dart board. Whether he actually threw darts at a calendar and/or map I don't know.

I thought that I could go ahead and make some random predictions of M6s and see what happens, but it would not be as useful as Roger's simple statistics, and I'm not going to bother. Maybe Brian will want to try. But, give statistics, maybe he will get 5 of 9 and next time you will get 8, and you will then be even more convinced that you have something, when all it needs to be is random and statistics. So, a waste of time.

Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: M6 quakes; test results - Skywise  16:53:29 - 4/21/2010  (76956)  (0)