Earthquake Warning UPDATE January 28, 2010
Posted by EQF on January 28, 2010 at 05:33:14:

EARTHQUAKE WARNING UPDATE January 28, 2010

Since the original January 26, 2010 Earthquake Warning was posted here a number of additional electromagnetic pulse type signals (EM Signals) have been detected. And it is believed that those signals are associated with approaching strong seismic activity.

My Data.html Web page has been updated with the latest Chart A earthquake forecast information.


http://www.Freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/Data.html

The Chart at the bottom of this present page is an expanded version of the January 28, 2010 Data.html Web page Chart A. The latest forecast data plus data for an especially strong recent EM Signal and data for an earthquake that occurred at 91 E longitude can be seen on the Chart. The following is the URL address for another EarthWave poster’s active forecast for that area:


http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/76529.html

One of the primary goals in my posting these Earthquake Warnings etc. to a public forum such as the EarthWaves bulletin board is so that other researchers can review the details of a forecast and add any support information to it that they might have. It is also fairly easy for me to generate support data for other researchers’ forecasts. And as the following explains, these Chart data (and other data not shown on the present Chart) are supportive of possible approaching seismic activity in the area pointed to by the previously mentioned earthquake researcher.

The horizontal lines on the Chart represent longitudes. Where there is a peak at some longitude on one of those lines it means that the Etdprog.exe earthquake forecasting computer program determined that EM Signals associated with that line or the earthquake associated with that line was a good match for earthquakes that occurred in the past at that longitude.

The computer program regards longitudes 90 and 180 degrees apart as being fairly similar when it does its calculations. So for example, a strong peak at 45 W could also be pointing to approaching seismic activity at 135 W, or 45 E, or 135 E.

--- Individual EM Signal related Line 2 on the Chart has a strong peak at 179 W. And that means that it could be pointing to 91 E.

--- Line 1 is for the earthquake that occurred at 91 E. And a number of peaks on that line are fairly good matches for peaks on Averaged EM Signal Time Window Lines 4 through perhaps 10. Those peaks are not present on earlier Time Window Lines indicating that the EM Signals associated with the peaks were generated fairly recently.

--- Very roughly, 50% of the time after strong EM Signals are detected the expected earthquake will occur within a few days to a week. The other 50% of the time it can be delayed for weeks or even months. My January 12, 2010 Haiti earthquake analysis posted here on January 14 indicated to me that signals pointing to that earthquake were likely being generated a full year before it occurred.

So, it is my conclusion that these Chart data and other data that I have evaluated are supportive of the forecast generated by the other researcher. My magnitude estimates would also be reasonably consistent with his.

It should be noted that my regular Chart A forecast data are also likely pointing to the approach of seismic activity at other locations. Each Time Window line can be an average of more than 100 EM Signals. And each signal could be associated with some 6.0 and higher magnitude earthquake about to occur somewhere on the planet.


http://www.Freewebz.com/eq-forecasting/images/20100128C1.png


Follow Ups:
     ● Corrected picture link January 28, 2010 - EQF  05:37:04 - 1/28/2010  (76549)  (1)
        ● Newsgroup posting January 28, 2010 - EQF  06:01:21 - 1/28/2010  (76551)  (0)