Tony, EQF,
I don't have the same reaction as mrrabbit but wanted to separate what I was posting from the EQF stuff. EQF is trying to do good but the repeated decsriptions of all the researchers and governments EQF is in contact with got old years ago.

I don't have any interest in spending time trying to figure out more on what the EQF wiggles are based on, but an EQF post in response to my question suggested it is in (large?) part based on eartones. I don't buy this, and indeed have seen nothing that gives me any indication that EQF is onto something. Roger and maybe especially John V. have posted many times on this.

It seems a bit of a waste because with EQF's time input and ability to prgram etc. he might be able to make a contribution if there was some physics behind what he was doing (mainstream physics. not unicorn physics).

You (tony) asked the question; I'm just being honest. I'm going to try to avoid posting more on this.

Chris