|
Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 |
Maybe I'm not getting it. I understand that the ultimate end is to predict quakes. Clearly, any questionable claim of successful prediction is offensive to the effort. On the other hand, what is wrong with simply publishing data and seeing if there is a correlation? Follow Ups: ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - Roger Hunter 11:16:31 - 1/15/2010 (76445) (2) ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - Tony 11:47:40 - 1/15/2010 (76448) (1) ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - Roger Hunter 12:18:50 - 1/15/2010 (76452) (0) ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - PennyB 11:47:28 - 1/15/2010 (76447) (1) ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - Roger Hunter 12:13:18 - 1/15/2010 (76451) (0) |
|