Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010
Posted by Tony on January 15, 2010 at 11:06:30:

Maybe I'm not getting it. I understand that the ultimate end is to predict quakes. Clearly, any questionable claim of successful prediction is offensive to the effort.

On the other hand, what is wrong with simply publishing data and seeing if there is a correlation?


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - Roger Hunter  11:16:31 - 1/15/2010  (76445)  (2)
        ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - Tony  11:47:40 - 1/15/2010  (76448)  (1)
           ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - Roger Hunter  12:18:50 - 1/15/2010  (76452)  (0)
        ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - PennyB  11:47:28 - 1/15/2010  (76447)  (1)
           ● Re: Time Window Peaks January 15, 2010 - Roger Hunter  12:13:18 - 1/15/2010  (76451)  (0)