Re: Haiti Quake - EM Signals Possibly Related?
Posted by EQF on January 14, 2010 at 13:23:45:

It is my opinion that you are getting a good chance to see why the science of earthquake forecasting is developing so slowly.

This is a science that is presently being controlled by government officials, members of the scientific community, and other people who have specific "agendas." One of those agendas, in my opinion, is to keep serious discussions from getting started regarding this science. And one of the ways to accomplish that is to ridicule people when they get involved in such discussions. It is my belief that quite a few people will no longer post notes here, and no new scientists will join the group in large measure because of all of the ridicule you can see in these posts. When I circulate reports to other researchers around the world pointing them to discussions at this site I warn them to be prepared for all of the hostile postings.

In posting your original note you broke one of those agenda based rules by daring to even ask if there might be any substance to the advisory I posted. And I was wondering how long it would take for someone to criticize you for that. That is often referred to as censorship by intimidation.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Haiti Quake - EM Signals Possibly Related?  - mrrabbit  16:39:10 - 1/14/2010  (76414)  (1)
        ● Re: Haiti Quake - EM Signals Possibly Related?  - EQF  19:07:23 - 1/14/2010  (76419)  (1)
           ● Re: Haiti Quake - EM Signals Possibly Related?  - mrrabbit  19:28:36 - 1/14/2010  (76422)  (0)
     ● Re: Haiti Quake - EM Signals Possibly Related?  - Roger Hunter  14:04:17 - 1/14/2010  (76411)  (1)
        ● Re: Haiti Quake - EM Signals Possibly Related?  - EQF  14:37:41 - 1/14/2010  (76412)  (0)