|
Please see details at Quakeprediction.com |
Might be a lot more impressive if you had advised us in ADVANCE which periods were to be "high risk". >>> This is shown on the front page of Quakeprediction.com. Also - what conceivable reason is there for eliminating quakes greater than 3.0 which were NOT felt by 11 or more people? If those were included, would your results be less impressive? >>> Because I have very little temperature data across the deserts, my forecasts are better in the cities where I have more data. Finally, it's your call - but why the likelihood of your predicted quake occurring in NE California? Of the four quadrants, that is the least seismic. >>> Because that's where there is more frictional heating going on right now during this 2 day forecast period. Mike Williams >>> Thanks for the questions Mike. Luke Thomas Follow Ups: ● Re: Please see details at Quakeprediction.com - heartland chris 17:54:12 - 8/19/2009 (75728) (1) ● Please keep an open mind Chris, because this method works. - Luke Thomas 19:23:01 - 8/19/2009 (75731) (1) ● Re: Please keep an open mind Chris, because this method works. - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 22:43:38 - 8/19/2009 (75734) (1) ● Flat Earth - Luke Thomas 09:26:03 - 8/20/2009 (75736) (1) ● Re: Flat Earth - Roger Hunter 09:41:00 - 8/20/2009 (75738) (1) ● Re: Flat Earth - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 07:29:36 - 8/21/2009 (75743) (1) ● Re: Flat Earth - Roger Hunter 08:18:43 - 8/21/2009 (75744) (0) |
|