You've got to be kidding, right?

These predictions are making a mockery of this board.

Also, given a predicted "5.2," how is a range of "500km" of any use whatsoever?

Frankly, Boyko, I've been watching this board for years. As a non-scientist, I'm willing to give people the benefit of the doubt when it comes to methodology. I think certain paradigm constraints in our science may be a bit restrictive. However, with this, you've outdone yourself.

Tony