Posted by Roger Hunter on March 14, 2009 at 08:47:48:
Glen; That's far more information than is necessary and creates a problem for you in that an error in any part of it could invalidate an otherwise perfect prediction. > Magnitude--- 3.5 to 4.5 Mw (Mag type I use) I usually ignore type. Most predictors don't know enough about it anyway. > Lat-lon 116.500W, 33.500N Ok, although 33.500, -116.500 is better. > Period---- 03/13/09 1900 PST to 03/18/09 1900 PST UTC is preferred. Time zones are hard to deal with. > Depth ---- 7Km to 17Km I've never seen anyone predict depth. > Area---Circular 50Km Radius or diameter? > Felt--- 200 to 400 Km depending on mechanism and receiving geology Not relevant, better to omit. > Basis---- Numerous micros across regional fault zones indicating a larger strain is going to take place. (pattern) Anza is ripe, and will be the relief point for this larger strain (micro) pattern. Items of interest but not relevant otherwise. > Focal mechanism--- Oblique with a northwest strike reference and a northeast dip of approx 70 degrees. You gotta be kidding. No one is going to be this detailed when they can't even get the date right. > Is this the kind of prediction we are looking for? Or too much info? Open to suggestions. Way too much information for my purposes. Roger
|