Re: Programming Languages Decisions - Earthquake Forecasting - August 18, 2008
Posted by Roger Hunter on August 18, 2008 at 09:13:39:

EDG;

As far as languagegoes, I would think it hardly matters. Anyone who intends to reprogram will use his language of choice.

What is needed is a list of exactly what needs to be done to come up with a working program, one detailed enough to be translated into a functioning program.

But to get anyone interested in even starting such an effort you need a peer reviewed published article discussing how your program could have predicted the last 20 or so major quakes.

Roger


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Programming Languages Decisions - Earthquake Forecasting - August 18, 2008 - EQF  09:36:45 - 8/27/2008  (74279)  (0)
     ● publish a report - John Vidale  08:22:41 - 8/20/2008  (74266)  (0)
     ● Re: Programming Languages Decisions - Earthquake Forecasting - August 18, 2008 - EQF  01:49:08 - 8/19/2008  (74257)  (1)
        ● Re: Programming Languages Decisions - Earthquake Forecasting - August 18, 2008 - Roger Hunter  06:22:05 - 8/19/2008  (74258)  (1)
           ● Re: Programming Languages Decisions - Earthquake Forecasting - August 18, 2008 - EQF  11:37:06 - 8/19/2008  (74261)  (0)