seems ridiculous to me
Posted by John Vidale on February 01, 2008 at 22:38:54:

this shift manages to capture 6 more hits, apparently not losing any, at the cost of an additional rule bringing a new factor (perigee) and an arbitrary number (3 days). Is there at least symmetry so that the window also slides back if perigee is AFTER syzygy, or would that produce inconvenient results?

This sounds like a prime example of tuning the method after the fact, then testing it as though it was a prediction, and not even counting the free parameters used to achieve the fit.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: seems ridiculous to me - Roger Hunter  07:19:22 - 2/2/2008  (73255)  (1)
        ● not sure - John Vidale  07:27:15 - 2/2/2008  (73256)  (1)
           ● Re: not sure - Roger Hunter  08:36:10 - 2/2/2008  (73257)  (0)