|
|
|
|
| Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire |
Thanks Lowell, that answers my question and then some. Canie was also pointing my in the right direction. I woke up this morning and realized I had no clue why the ring of fire was where it was. I liked the froth analogy, that made complete sense! About what percentage of the ring of fire involves subduction? As far as I know, the SoCal portion is not, but strike/slip in nature, with the Pacific Plate moving north as compared to the North American Plate. I assume that changes to subduction once one gets to the triple junction? Thanks again! Michael Follow Ups: ● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - Lowell 11:47:10 - 5/2/2001 (7275) (1) ● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - michael 11:55:09 - 5/2/2001 (7276) (1) ● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - Lowell 12:02:54 - 5/2/2001 (7277) (2) ● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - michael 12:22:34 - 5/2/2001 (7279) (1) ● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - Lowell 12:36:50 - 5/2/2001 (7283) (1) ● Complications - michael 12:54:23 - 5/2/2001 (7284) (0) ● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - Canie 12:07:28 - 5/2/2001 (7278) (2) ● Movies - michael 13:49:27 - 5/2/2001 (7286) (0) ● Re: Continents, Oceans, and The Ring of Fire - michael 12:25:32 - 5/2/2001 (7281) (0) |
|
|
|
|
