Re: The Holy Grail of Earthquake Prediction
Posted by Don in Hollister on May 01, 2001 at 19:24:37:

Hi Roger. You say, “The way it’s done is to do it.” True no one is going to do it for me, but as you have already set yourself in the position of trying to tear the fortress down means you are in a sense negative therefore you are unwilling to sit down with me and any others who may come forth to explore what works and what doesn’t.

I’m not out to prove anything. All I’m saying is for the various different disciplines to sit down together and explore the ways of predicting, or forecasting a major quake. As it is now one geologist can’t agree with another geologist let alone sit down with a person who hears tones.

It means that each person who comes to the table has to accept each and every other person theory as being true even though they don’t believe it. Could you do that? Take Care…Don in creepy town.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: The Holy Grail of Earthquake Prediction - Roger Musson  08:29:37 - 5/3/2001  (7364)  (0)
     ● Re: The Holy Grail of Earthquake Prediction - Roger Hunter  19:38:52 - 5/1/2001  (7254)  (0)
     ● Re: The Holy Grail of Earthquake Prediction - Roger Hunter  19:36:37 - 5/1/2001  (7253)  (1)
        ● Re: The Holy Grail of Earthquake Prediction - Don in Hollister  19:59:14 - 5/1/2001  (7255)  (0)