Re: Forecasting note to Roger
Posted by EQF on June 15, 2007 at 17:54:48:

Hi Brian,

First, my theories are explained very clearly at my Web site.

Second, you just proved my point.

There was nothing in my note that was intended to offend you. This is simply meant to be a scientific discussion.

However, your response does indicate that you got upset by something.

My point is that it is almost impossible to have these types of discussions without someone getting upset regardless of how harmless the information is intended to be. I have learned that from many past discussions. At present the only way to avoid situations where people get upset is to simply not have the discussions in the first place.

The basic problem is that it is too difficult to include enough information in these types of exchanges to make it clear what is being said. Any statement can be interpreted in a number of ways. And quite often people will interpret something in a manner that the author did not intend.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Forecasting note to Roger - Skywise  20:42:46 - 6/15/2007  (72020)  (1)
        ● Re: Forecasting note to Roger - EQF  08:33:35 - 6/16/2007  (72023)  (1)
           ● Re: Forecasting note to Roger - Skywise  22:02:24 - 6/16/2007  (72026)  (0)
     ● Re: Forecasting note to Roger - Roger Hunter  19:22:43 - 6/15/2007  (72018)  (0)