|
Re: Track Record |
Old posts, I assume. That's why your table was so important; who has time to look thru years of old posts? Not me, that's for sure, and I'm retired! So I have to take Canie's word for it. But I'd rather be able to judge for myself. Roger Follow Ups: ● Re: Track Record - michael 15:55:39 - 4/25/2001 (7055) (1) ● Re: Track Record - Roger Hunter 16:23:35 - 4/25/2001 (7059) (1) ● Re: Track Record - michael 16:41:14 - 4/25/2001 (7064) (1) ● Re: Track Record - Roger Hunter 17:06:31 - 4/25/2001 (7069) (0) |
|