Re: Linear
Posted by Dennis on April 16, 2001 at 10:06:12:

Your point is taken on the 3.0 example. My prior counter to that was that it would take many hits on a 3.0 prediction to become statistically significant. I also don't think that people would take too much notice on somebody hitting a bunch of 3.0 predictions in a seismically active area.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Linear - Roger Hunter  10:08:10 - 4/16/2001  (6749)  (1)
        ● Re: Linear - Dennis  11:02:30 - 4/16/2001  (6764)  (1)
           ● Re: Linear - Roger Hunter  18:37:48 - 4/16/2001  (6771)  (1)
              ● Re: Linear - Dennis  09:45:40 - 4/17/2001  (6780)  (0)