|
Re: Linear |
Your point is taken on the 3.0 example. My prior counter to that was that it would take many hits on a 3.0 prediction to become statistically significant. I also don't think that people would take too much notice on somebody hitting a bunch of 3.0 predictions in a seismically active area. Follow Ups: ● Re: Linear - Roger Hunter 10:08:10 - 4/16/2001 (6749) (1) ● Re: Linear - Dennis 11:02:30 - 4/16/2001 (6764) (1) ● Re: Linear - Roger Hunter 18:37:48 - 4/16/2001 (6771) (1) ● Re: Linear - Dennis 09:45:40 - 4/17/2001 (6780) (0) |
|