Near Hits
Posted by michael on April 10, 2001 at 21:43:19:

I'm just suggesting listing the predictions without any evaluation of any kind. Simply:

1. Predictor
2. Date/Time Window
3. Location
4. Magniitude.

It would be up to each individual to evaluate any given "Hit", "Near Hit", or whatever.

My point is that many so called "predictors" are even afraid to list their predictions out of fear of failure. All I'm suggesting is just listing the facts plain and simple, without any kind of public evaluation such as whether a prediction was a hit, miss, or whatever.

Michael

Michael


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Near Hits - Roger Hunter  04:51:32 - 4/11/2001  (6673)  (0)