Re: Los Angeles earthquake risk continues to build .... - Correlation
Posted by Tony on March 05, 2007 at 18:49:44:

Interesting correlation . . . as time progresses, so does the magnitude of the possible quake.

Can possible magnitude be expressed as something other than magnitude? For example, does it translate to a greater probability of a seismic occurrence?

Also, what happens when we measure the trend out beyond March 8? What are the probabilities and anticipated magnitude?

Tony

Follow Ups:
     ● Questions .........  - Luke  19:19:39 - 3/5/2007  (63233)  (1)
        ● 5.4 to 5.8 expected in LA March 9-11th 2007 - Luke  06:19:18 - 3/8/2007  (63303)  (1)
           ● From Northridge to Anaheim and Long Beach - Luke  16:29:24 - 3/8/2007  (63308)  (1)
              ● Expecting LA quake before the 17th. - Luke  06:34:00 - 3/12/2007  (63382)  (1)
                 ● Re: Expecting LA quake before the 17th. - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  07:23:37 - 3/17/2007  (63606)  (1)
                    ● It's working out great ! ...  - Luke  17:15:04 - 3/17/2007  (63616)  (1)
                       ● Re: It's working out great ! ...  - Roger Hunter  21:38:55 - 3/17/2007  (63622)  (1)
                          ● Re: It's working out great ! ...  - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  07:52:59 - 3/18/2007  (63633)  (1)
                             ● Northridge area ....  - Luke  06:39:08 - 3/20/2007  (63685)  (0)