Hi Roger.

Round and round and round we go.

I had pointed out some serious flaws in the formula and could just as easily give you in between examples that are what the real trouble is all about.

Let's just get it out in the open that the fact is the only real reason you want to do this is to prove no one can beat chance.

I don't know what Michaels motives are, maybe he thinks it will provide some type of useful standings. To me, it kind of undermines the purpose of this type of forum, which is to try new ideas.

Maybe there is a time and a place for probability and checking on someone's ability. But this isn't it.