|
Self Organized Criticality vs. |
Every time I post I get Contradicted. What a wonderful way to promote your philosophy of freedom of opinion. Some contradiction, yes, but every dam time I post? Some are supportive, but not those who post contradiction every time on my strings. Now you'll probably come up with "Have to keep you honest or something to that regard. So your opinions are the only correct ones?N.I.C.E. (See Mir Post for a perfect example. I even quote 40 000 tons will hit Earth and have the answer "Not much will survive re-entry." And Another answer that "it's way too small and slow to make a tsunami." Posting it as fact instead of "it's my opinion that..." Makes my post invalid as my opinion or others. You are both in the minority in your opinions as scientists all over agree that 40 000 tonnes will survive re-entry. Read more carefully as the facts were in my post and are based on science. If you want to always be critical, state your criticisms as opinion or back those statements up with factual quotes to illustrate your points. Otherwise it's contradiction without "A series of connected statements intended to establish a proposition" (Argument) The time I spend typing seems wasted otherwise...mb. Follow Ups: ● Re: Self Organized Criticality vs. - Roger Hunter 08:13:32 - 3/18/2001 (6121) (1) ● Re: Self Organized Criticality vs. - martin 09:21:59 - 3/18/2001 (6123) (1) ● Re: Self Organized Criticality vs. - Don in Hollister 10:06:47 - 3/18/2001 (6139) (1) ● Re: Self Organized Criticality vs. - martin 10:12:42 - 3/18/2001 (6141) (1) ● Re: Self Organized Criticality vs. - Roger Hunter 14:03:24 - 3/23/2001 (6348) (1) ● Re: Self Organized Criticality vs. - Roger Hunter 14:49:28 - 3/23/2001 (6350) (0) |
|