|
Re: experts disagree |
Thanks, John, for confirming that I at least have the framework of current thinking generally correct. And, would you agree that the purpose of most of this research is to further refine seismologists' ability to make probabilistic predictions? Primarily for hazard assesment purposes? I'll also take this opportunity to thank you for taking the time to provide your expert opinion to this forum. Mike Williams
Follow Ups: ● several reasons for research - John Vidale 16:13:02 - 12/10/2006 (61063) (0) |
|