Re: Steve's Parkfield Prediction Failed
Posted by Steve on December 02, 2006 at 07:57:38:

I agree that this failed. I agree that the expected result did not occur during the window posted. I also did not receive the confirming spike that usually occurs approximately 12 hours prior to the event I was expecting.
This experiment was a failure, and I freely admit it.
Currently, the strains are rising again at Parkfield (at a more rapid rate and a higher level than the original posting), so I am expecting something, but I am not stating a probable window or magnitude this time. We'll see what happens, then I'll have a nice data set to base future experiments on.
Thank you for your constructive criticism, Mike.
Steve


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Steve's Parkfield Prediction Failed - heartland chris  08:23:15 - 12/2/2006  (60806)  (2)
        ● Re: Steve's Parkfield Prediction Failed - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  06:34:48 - 12/3/2006  (60828)  (0)
        ● Re: Steve's Parkfield Prediction Failed - Steve  09:05:09 - 12/2/2006  (60809)  (1)
           ● Re: Comment on tensor strain - Steve S/ SF  22:40:10 - 12/3/2006  (60860)  (1)
              ● Re: Comment on tensor strain - Cathryn  23:11:53 - 12/3/2006  (60871)  (1)
                 ● Re: Comment on tensor strain - Steve S/ SF  23:24:52 - 12/3/2006  (60873)  (0)