Re: New Scientist--Moon-Rain=EQs
Posted by Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande on November 24, 2006 at 07:12:32:

Hi Canie,

I must respectfully disagree. Though I find Canie's literary products laughable, I think her posting was very much on-topic. EPF needs to retain its reputation as a fair venue for discussion of earthquake prediction. Callie found an affirming reference to a prominent statement in one of her books, and brought it to our attention. I took it more as Callie blowing her own horn (again), than trying to sell more copies of her book.

Her post generated a brief but interesting discussion, and, once again, the lack of any actual intellectual foundation under her supposed "science" was shown.

Michael Williams
Arroyo Grande, CA USA


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Mike-New Scientist--Moon-Rain=EQs - cal  13:08:03 - 11/24/2006  (60505)  (0)
     ● Re: New Scientist--Moon-Rain=EQs - Canie  09:22:10 - 11/24/2006  (60493)  (2)
        ● Yes - A Typo Again! - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande  11:55:20 - 11/24/2006  (60503)  (0)
        ● I doubt many sales come from posts - John Vidale  09:35:02 - 11/24/2006  (60494)  (1)
           ● Re: the scientific report -my intention - cal  10:48:13 - 11/24/2006  (60500)  (0)