|
Re: New Scientist--Moon-Rain=EQs |
Hi Canie, I must respectfully disagree. Though I find Canie's literary products laughable, I think her posting was very much on-topic. EPF needs to retain its reputation as a fair venue for discussion of earthquake prediction. Callie found an affirming reference to a prominent statement in one of her books, and brought it to our attention. I took it more as Callie blowing her own horn (again), than trying to sell more copies of her book. Her post generated a brief but interesting discussion, and, once again, the lack of any actual intellectual foundation under her supposed "science" was shown. Michael Williams Follow Ups: ● Re: Mike-New Scientist--Moon-Rain=EQs - cal 13:08:03 - 11/24/2006 (60505) (0) ● Re: New Scientist--Moon-Rain=EQs - Canie 09:22:10 - 11/24/2006 (60493) (2) ● Yes - A Typo Again! - Mike Williams in Arroyo Grande 11:55:20 - 11/24/2006 (60503) (0) ● I doubt many sales come from posts - John Vidale 09:35:02 - 11/24/2006 (60494) (1) ● Re: the scientific report -my intention - cal 10:48:13 - 11/24/2006 (60500) (0) |
|