|
Posted by Mary Maya on March 15, 2001 at 20:05:30:
Hi Michael. A long response, sorry, so long I just missed the one I came to post for, oh well, next time. ;) Sure lots of work following all of this huh? Sure hate being nit picky, but, if your gonna set parameters, and someone follows them, then we should get the results right now shouldn't we? Going back to this post: http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/5879.html I was pointing out that post #5742 was a miss, of mine, that you missed. And gave comments on why I felt I missed. I have no problem pointing out when I miss. Though I'm still waiting for the high 2s in that area. ;) Then on the post below there, BTW, I had questioned as to why this one, #5017 was overlooked? A miss, too large an area, what? So here it is: http://www.earthwaves.org/wwwboard/messages/5017.html Central to Northern CA
Posted by Mary Maya on February 06, 2001 at 16:31:11:
Location: Central to Northern CA - Lat: 41N - Long: 124W - Range: Bottom Latitude: 35N - Right Longitude: 116W Magnitude: 3.0 to 5.8 - From: Feb 6 16:30 - To: Feb 18 23:59 Hi all. I don't do this much anymore but thought I'd test this out. Mostly based on my classic Pinnacles/Mammoth symptoms. But other symptoms for areas in this range as well. Most likely a 3.0 to 4.5 within a 100 mile radius of me. Just testing to see if sensitives can make this form fit. My confidence on the Pinnacles or Mammoth area is about 75%. The rest of the area not as certain. Some sounds to back it up, but no tones as yet. Hope I did this right. ;) Bye for now Mary Maya
Following the parameters set there are these:
NEIC: Earthquake Search Results
U. S. G E O L O G I C A L S U R V E Y E A R T H Q U A K E D A T A B A S E FILE CREATED: Thu Mar 15 20:26:33 2001
Geographic Grid Search Earthquakes= 8
Latitude: 41.000N - 35.000N
Longitude: 116.000W - 124.000W
Catalog Used: PDE
Date Range: Year: 2001 - 2001 Month: 02/Day: 06 Month: 02/Day: 18
Magnitude Range: 3.0 - 5.8
Data Selection: Historical & Preliminary Data
CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE IEFM DTSVNWG DIST
NFPO km
TFS
PDE-Q 2001 02 07 135939 36.66 -121.29 7 3.10 MLNC .... .......
PDE-Q 2001 02 07 151551 36.66 -121.28 7 3.00 MLNC .... .......
PDE-Q 2001 02 07 182208 36.67 -121.29 7 3.90 MLNC 4F.. .......
PDE-Q 2001 02 11 230406 36.79 -121.52 7 4.00 MLNC .... .......
PDE-Q 2001 02 13 194433.40 38.76 -119.60 10 4.20 mb GS .... .......
PDE-Q 2001 02 16 034032 37.09 -121.03 7 3.00 MDNC .... .......
PDE-Q 2001 02 17 130411.21 38.66 -119.75 5 3.50 MLGS .... .......
PDE-Q 2001 02 17 225418.99 38.29 -118.29 10 3.80 MLGS .... .......
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Even narrowing it down to the "100 mile radius" there are these: NEIC: Earthquake Search Results U. S. G E O L O G I C A L S U R V E Y E A R T H Q U A K E D A T A B A S E FILE CREATED: Thu Mar 15 20:50:54 2001
Circle Search Earthquakes= 5
Circle Center Point Latitude: 37.260N Longitude: 121.810W
Radius: 160.000 km
Catalog Used: PDE
Date Range: Year: 2001 - 2001 Month: 02/Day: 06 Month: 02/Day: 18
Magnitude Range: 3.0 - 5.8
Data Selection: Historical & Preliminary Data
CAT YEAR MO DA ORIG TIME LAT LONG DEP MAGNITUDE IEFM DTSVNWG DIST
NFPO km
TFS
PDE-Q 2001 02 07 135939 36.66 -121.29 7 3.10 MLNC .... ....... 81
PDE-Q 2001 02 07 151551 36.66 -121.28 7 3.00 MLNC .... ....... 81
PDE-Q 2001 02 07 182208 36.67 -121.29 7 3.90 MLNC 4F.. ....... 80
PDE-Q 2001 02 11 230406 36.79 -121.52 7 4.00 MLNC .... ....... 57
PDE-Q 2001 02 16 034032 37.09 -121.03 7 3.00 MDNC .... ....... 71
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Like you said, a hit is a hit. ;)
I may fail to post predictions sometimes, for one reason or another. Either too busy, or not in the mood to play the game, but I seldom miss anything over a 4 in Central to Northern CA. Though I may here shortly as I've been too busy to follow it. Hmmm, like this that just hit:
3.0 2001/03/15 19:46:58 37.337N 121.704W 7.9 17 km (10 mi) E of San Jose City Hall, CA But I do believe congrats are in order to another Mary, on another list. ;) Bye for now. Mary Maya, on behalf of Sensitives ;)
|
