Re: michael a sensitive guy? Maybe
Posted by dib on March 06, 2001 at 07:08:42:

None of the symptoms you describe are any different from those experienced by just about all normal non-sensitive humans in the world. The difference is that you assume they can be attributed to earthquakes. That assumption is based solely on a very tenuous time correlation that most likely is purely coincidental. Don't you think it is more likely that your sensitivities are no different from those of normal people, and that normal people do not sense earthquakes? There is no mechanism yet known that would make it logical to assume that you can sense earthquakes hundreds of miles away. The suggestion that you can sense direction and tell location by the difference in tones and your attributing emotional feelings to earthquakes indicates you are merely deluding yourself. The problem I have with that is you are spreading pseudoscience. The world has enough of that already.


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: michael a sensitive guy? Maybe - Petra Challus  08:07:31 - 3/6/2001  (5806)  (1)
        ● Re: michael a sensitive guy? Maybe - dib  20:04:26 - 3/6/2001  (5815)  (1)
           ● Re: michael a sensitive guy? Maybe - Petra Challus  21:41:49 - 3/6/2001  (5816)  (1)
              ● Re: michael a sensitive guy? Maybe - dib  22:42:42 - 3/6/2001  (5817)  (1)
                 ● Re: michael a sensitive guy? Maybe - Petra Challus  07:32:31 - 3/7/2001  (5819)  (1)
                    ● Re: michael a sensitive guy? Maybe - dib  19:42:39 - 3/7/2001  (5837)  (0)