Hello Roger:

I have been watching your debate; good work. Despite his effusive apology, I doubt Mike has learned anything from it. Despite the fact that his work has always been riddled with errors, his enormous ego prevents him from even imagining that he could ever be wrong, so his first reaction to critics is to unleash a string of hostile insults. He has never apologized for accusing me of fraud im my study that started the prediction evaluation debate--I still doubt that he has even read it, much less understood it. In any case, it's only a matter of time before he reverts to form. I predict he will be back to slandering you before the next 2.0 hits somewhere in the world, probably the Ring of Fire, so watch your step : )

Don in Berkeley