Since the intent was to verify mb's claims, then it shouldn't have never gone to a chart and should have only shown mb's predictions. I don't think that mb pays any attention to what fault the quake would hit on though. Its just somewhere in the general area. And we all know that quakes on one fault can generate quakes on another fault.

I do like the idea of doing a chart as long as it shows whether or not the predictor is getting close in one way or another. In its current format, it doesn't do that.