Hi all. Not sure what's going on here, on the board? Didn't read alot of it. Dennis, I hope you don't leave, you have helped me understand so much of what I hear, wether you know it or not. Your mention of a short, interrupted signal, I think, for Hector, clued me in to pay attention to the short, but strong tones I had ignored prior to that. And a few other discussions here similar to that over the last year or so. That is how I learn, by reading what others are finding to be true for them. And seeing if it pertains to what I am doing. If you do leave, please keep in touch. I don't have your e-mail but you can reach me at:

marymaya@earthsensitives.org

or mary_maya_greenler@yahoo.com

Don't worry on the e-mail Canie, I have filters. :)

As far as a solution. Why not simply link the prediction, to the post number on the table. It is very easy to do, then any discussion regarding the prediction can be accesed easily. No e-mailing and such, sounds like too much work to me. The scoring is over my head, but should be easy enough to use either a "hit,miss,or close" reference on the table. Then they can click on the link and read the followups for themselves. I'm too left brain, you'll have to figure the scoring yourselves. ;) Me, it's what I state or it's a miss, but I understand how others might have a harder time with that. Also, maybe the predictor should state, as some do, "+/-" and the fraction of mag, or hours on the time? I'm sure you'll get it all figured out. I think we sensitives are maybe wearing off on some of you lately. Getting too sensitive to the energies? It ain't hard to do. ;)

Also, I suggested a seperate table for near hits before, but think it was misunderstood?

Bye for now.

Mary Maya