Re: Show me Canie!
Posted by martin on December 31, 2000 at 00:03:03:

The dozens of people that recieved timely warnings to large worldwide events wish you and many others would do it too. You make it sound so easy. I challenge you then to post ten likely earthquakes to occur in ten days, and we'll see if your theory of how easy forecasting by foreshocks seems will pan out. I spend dozens of co$tly hours figuring out everything from history to dozens of other factors as well. If I haven't been contributing anything new then why aren't there many people warning many people. You make it sound so easy it's almosta low blow. SO SHOW ME. I doubt you can get 2 in ten of the bat. Should you care to reiterate your claim that accurate prediction by foreshocks is not adding anything, then I must be on the wrong website. And from the sitemaster! Seriously!
Repeat your claims and I will never post here again. Defensive yes. I have something provable to defend. You have always been fairly critical of my work Canie, is it personal? sincerely, Martin. You'll find that just keeping up with the data you'll need to forecast a list of ten earthquakes will take some time, and what would you feel like if someone who should be an authority on earthquakes just blew off your efforts? SO SHOW ME!...mb. I AM Smiling as I type this...


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: Canie Showed ME/ us! - martin@n.i.c.e.  15:02:31 - 1/2/2001  (4280)  (0)
     ● Re: Canie's travel advisory - Canie  23:11:22 - 12/31/2000  (4245)  (3)
        ● Re: Canie's travel advisory - Canie  14:43:48 - 1/2/2001  (4278)  (1)
           ● Re: Canie's 3rd. hit! - martin@n.i.c.e.  14:52:41 - 1/2/2001  (4279)  (0)
        ● Re: Canie Gets a MAJOR hit! - martin@n.i.c.e.  00:23:52 - 1/1/2001  (4247)  (1)
           ● Re: Another BIG HIT! - martin  10:53:08 - 1/1/2001  (4259)  (1)
              ● Re: Another BIG HIT! - Cathryn  14:16:37 - 1/1/2001  (4265)  (0)
        ● Re: Canie's travel advisory - Bob Shannon  23:32:11 - 12/31/2000  (4246)  (1)
           ● Re: Canie's travel advisory - Canie  11:22:09 - 1/1/2001  (4260)  (1)
              ● Re: Canie's travel advisory - martin  11:58:08 - 1/1/2001  (4261)  (1)
                 ● Re: Canie's travel advisory - Cathryn  14:25:54 - 1/1/2001  (4268)  (0)