That's me all right.

You can see the results of my latest test of Jim on his Syzygy site, the Let's Talk page. Jim finally posted all his primary windows since 1973. My analysis shows he's done better than chance or worse than chance, depending on how you count!

If you count the number of hits versus number of predictions, where a hit is a window with at least 1 quake, he's doing better than chance.

If you count the number of quakes in windows versus total number of quakes, he's worse than chance.

But he's nowhere near the 75% he claims. 34% is more like it.

Roger

PS: it doesn't matter how nice a person he is. He's making false claims of predictive ability.