Re: For Cathryn - "Normal"
Posted by heartland chris on October 16, 2006 at 06:46:40:

Yup, Mike got what I meant. Usual for south Hawaii would be "normal" because of the collapse of the south part of the Island. But, especially if it is really that deep, it is not a "usual" quake, although the summary of the USGS page said there was a M6.9 decades ago (1951??). I'd still like to know the details of this quake. The day before, heartland wife and I were commenting that there had not been an interesting quake since the M6.0 in the Guld of Mexico, of which I still don't know any details..
"Interesting" of course is also related with whether it was in a part of the world that we are interested in...
Chris


Follow Ups:
     ● Second Quake-Harvard MT Solution - Glen  10:44:47 - 10/16/2006  (41709)  (2)
        ● Re: Second Quake-Harvard MT Solution - Glen  14:43:11 - 10/16/2006  (41712)  (1)
           ● 1868 quakes 4 days apart - chris in suburbia  06:31:03 - 10/17/2006  (41721)  (1)
              ● Hawaii flash flood - heartland chris  09:46:24 - 10/17/2006  (41723)  (1)
                 ● Re: Hawaii flash flood - Canie  11:43:30 - 10/17/2006  (41724)  (0)
        ● Re: Second Quake-Harvard MT Solution - heartland chris  13:04:03 - 10/16/2006  (41710)  (0)