Re: The information in the prior post is 100% accurate
Posted by Skywise on October 03, 2006 at 22:31:35:

Perhaps I'm being prejudiced and allowing myself to to be influenced by stereotypes....

But as the saying goes, if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....

The first post reads like spam. This one reads like the ramblings of a net kook.

If the information you seek to disseminate is truly appropriate for this forum, then you need to present it in a more appropriate form.

For one thing, this last post looks like one giant run on sentence. Paragraph breaks would make reading it much easier. For that alone I didn't even bother to read it. I looked at the screen and saw a jumble of letters so messy I could have gone cross eyed and not known any better.

Also, the capitolized insults towards those of us who found fault with your first post are a classic hallmark of the net kook.

So, if you are not a spamming net kook, then you need to stop posting like one.

To use an analogy, if you don't want to be mistaken for a gang banger, don't dress and act like one.

Brian


Follow Ups:
     ● Re: The information in the prior post is 100% accurate - Cathryn  23:21:52 - 10/3/2006  (41197)  (1)
        ● Re: The information in the prior post is 100% accurate - Skywise  22:21:34 - 10/4/2006  (41238)  (0)